|
| |
CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION OF POWER PLANTS
IN TORNE VALLEY,
TOWN OF RAMAPO, NEW YORK
|
There are two power plants proposed for the Torne Valley in the Town of
Ramapo, New York. Both would be located within the Ramapo River Watershed in the
Northern Highlands. The area is a federally designated sole source
aquifer; supplying water to over 2,000,000 people in Rockland and Bergen
Counties.
The siting of these plants comes under the New York Public Service Law
Article X. This is a recognized fast track process for siting electric
generating facilities. The Public Service Commission Board has usurped the local
"home rule".
|
Local voices are heard only through a legal procedure
that allows limited intervenor funds for expert testimony. Legal funds are not
available to the community. This places an undue burden on the community that
may not even realize benefits from the construction and operation of the power
producing facilities.
The burden to the local communities is significant, for both the siting
procedure and operation of power plants. The threats to the quality of life in
the surrounding communities are great. Threatened clean air and water are key
concerns; as well as many others.
|

 |
Proposed site would pose threat to wildlife habitats, especially
threatened timber rattlesnakes and native brook trout.
|
 |
Emissions would contribute to further air pollution area is already
considered in the severe ozone non-attainment zone (emission
potential of: oxides of nitrogen (Nox) 1317.81 pounds per day, volatile
organic compounds (VOC) 279.18 pounds per day)
|
 |
VOCs and Nox are precursors of ozone, responsible for human health
problems when inhaled, even at very low levels
|
 |
Bulk storage of 19% ammonia (20% EPA rated hazardous material) over
50,000 gallons, potential threat of contamination to water source, from
spills
|
 |
Local schools are within two miles of proposed site
|
 |
Proposal does not consider the EPA national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) of PM2.5, recently upheld by the US Supreme Court (No. 99-1257.
Argued November 7, 2000 -Decided February 27, 2001)
|
 |
Cumulative air impact results of two facilities exceed air quality
standard, whereby each party asserts no responsibility
|
 |
Article X imposes no stipulations that dirty old facilities be closed,
rather leaves that to resulting economic competition of merchant power
producers
|
 |
Proposed facilities fueled by natural gas only, which would be subject to
market price and availability, potentially limiting reliability of energy
and price to customer |
|
 |
Local energy need does not outweigh use of local natural resources,
electricity is to be sold to the northeast power grid
|
 |
Proposed site is surrounded on three sides by Palisades Interstate Park,
recreational parkland for millions of visitors
|
 |
Unlined capped landfill near the proposed site presents a challenge to the
needed blasting during construction; this may affect drinking water
|
 |
Depletion of drinking water would be significant (ANP-continues to change
its intended use)
|
 |
Well capacity is already lessened due to a spil1 by Hudson Technologies,
Inc, of approximately 7,797 pounds of Freon 11 to the ground surface, which
has impacted ground water conditions
|
 |
Rockland County does not have air-monitoring receptors to evaluate air
quality, projected models reflect studies of area outside the County
|
 |
Statistically, Rockland is number one in NYS incidence of breast cancer:
our immune systems are already compromised, additional pollutants may add
greater stress to the health of the community
|
 |
Article X does not address conservation or alternative energy |
|

|